whatsinmywater.co
Water Quality Lookup / California / San Joaquin County / SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - LINCOLN VILLAGE
EPA SDWIS ยท San Joaquin County, California

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - LINCOLN VILLAGE Water Quality Report

Serving roughly 5,841 people in San Joaquin County, California.

Data current as of July 2026
๐Ÿ”Straight from EPA
๐ŸงชReal Lab Results
๐Ÿ“…Updated Quarterly
๐Ÿ Local Expertise
Results for SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - LINCOLN VILLAGE

1 water provider directly on file, serving roughly 5,841 people in San Joaquin County, California.

Quick answer: SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - LINCOLN VILLAGE has no violations on file. One reading is worth knowing about: Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5) was measured at 27UG/L, among the highest of the 571 providers on file in this area. It's the most notable figure in this system's record among its 571 local peers.
Utility SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - LINCOLN VILLAGE Population served 5,841 Owner Local government
No violations on file

Contaminants found

Metals
Naturally occurring or corrosion-related elements, e.g. lead, arsenic, copper
Lead Summary
Detected: 0 mg/L (ppm)
12/31/2025
Copper, Free
Detected: 77 UG/L (ppb)
8/26/2025
Disinfection Byproducts
Formed when chlorine used to disinfect water reacts with organic matter
Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5)
Detected: 27 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
TTHM
Detected: 44 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
A group of disinfection byproducts formed when chlorine reacts with organic matter. Long-term exposure above the legal limit has been linked to increased cancer risk in some studies.
Chloroform
Detected: 11 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
One of the individual trihalomethane disinfection byproducts, formed when chlorine reacts with organic matter.
Bromodichloromethane
Detected: 9 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Dibromochloromethane
Detected: 16 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Bromoform
Detected: 8 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Other
Additional substances tested that don't fit neatly into the categories above
Dichloroaceticacid
Detected: 5 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Trichloroaceticacid
Detected: 4 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Dibromoaceticacid
Detected: 6 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Monochloroaceticacid
Detected: 12 UG/L (ppb)
10/9/2025
Filtration considerations: See the table below for how whole-house carbon, under-sink reverse osmosis, and under-sink carbon systems compare against what's actually on file here. These are general system types, not a specific product recommendation.
Contaminant Whole-House Carbon Under-Sink RO Under-Sink Carbon
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)YesYesYes
Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)YesYesYes
ChloroformYesYesYes
Chlorine / TasteYesYesYes
Sediment / TurbidityYesYesYes
TrichloroethyleneYesYesYes
TetrachloroethyleneYesYesYes
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneYesYesYes
1,1-DichloroethyleneYesYesYes
BromoformYesYesYes
BromodichloromethaneYesYesYes
DibromochloromethaneYesYesYes
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneYesYesYes
Vinyl ChlorideYesYesYes
Carbon TetrachlorideYesYesYes
BenzeneYesYesYes
TolueneYesYesYes
XyleneYesYesYes
Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5)YesYesYes
LeadPartialYesPartial
ArsenicPartialYesPartial
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent)PartialYesPartial
CopperPartialYesPartial
Combined UraniumPartialYesPartial
PFOAPartialYes*Partial
PFOSPartialYes*Partial
NitratePartialYesPartial
Combined RadiumPartialYesPartial
DichloroaceticacidPartialYesPartial
TrichloroaceticacidPartialYesPartial
DibromoaceticacidPartialYesPartial
MonochloroaceticacidPartialYesPartial
Copper, FreePartialYesPartial
Coliform Bacteria (indicator)NoYesNo

Browse by city

Browse by county

Want a different ZIP, city, or address?
Look up your water quality โ†’
Learn more
What is TTHM? Understanding EPA Violation Status Is Chromium-6 Dangerous? Whole-House vs. Under-Sink Filtration Lead and Copper in Drinking Water What is PFAS? Arsenic and Uranium Explained Nitrate and Fluoride Explained Water Hardness, pH, and Turbidity What is Coliform Bacteria?