whatsinmywater.co
Water Quality Lookup / California / Nevada County / NEVADA ID - E. GEORGE, BANNER MOUNTAIN
EPA SDWIS ยท Nevada County, California

NEVADA ID - E. GEORGE, BANNER MOUNTAIN Water Quality Report

Serving roughly 17,154 people in Nevada County, California.

Data current as of July 2026
๐Ÿ”Straight from EPA
๐ŸงชReal Lab Results
๐Ÿ“…Updated Quarterly
๐Ÿ Local Expertise
Results for NEVADA ID - E. GEORGE, BANNER MOUNTAIN

1 water provider directly on file, serving roughly 17,154 people in Nevada County, California.

Quick answer: NEVADA ID - E. GEORGE, BANNER MOUNTAIN has no violations on file and no single reading stands out against its peers (220 other providers in this area). It serves roughly 17,154 people, and the full breakdown below reflects everything EPA and California have on record for it.
Utility NEVADA ID - E. GEORGE, BANNER MOUNTAIN Population served 17,154 Owner Local government
No violations on file

Contaminants found

Metals
Naturally occurring or corrosion-related elements, e.g. lead, arsenic, copper
Lead Summary
Detected: 0 mg/L (ppm)
12/31/2024
Chromium, Hex
Detected: 0.076 UG/L (ppb)
5/5/2025
Disinfection Byproducts
Formed when chlorine used to disinfect water reacts with organic matter
Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5)
Detected: 15 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
TTHM
Detected: 41 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
A group of disinfection byproducts formed when chlorine reacts with organic matter. Long-term exposure above the legal limit has been linked to increased cancer risk in some studies.
Chloroform
Detected: 39 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
One of the individual trihalomethane disinfection byproducts, formed when chlorine reacts with organic matter.
Bromodichloromethane
Detected: 2.7 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
Calculated Parameters
Values worked out mathematically from other test results, not measured directly
Alkalinity, Bicarbonate
Detected: 12 MG/L (ppm)
8/27/2025
Other
Additional substances tested that don't fit neatly into the categories above
Dichloroaceticacid
Detected: 4.8 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
Trichloroaceticacid
Detected: 9.8 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
Monochloroaceticacid
Detected: 2.3 UG/L (ppb)
7/11/2025
Carbon, Total
Detected: 0.93 MG/L (ppm)
5/21/2025
Alkalinity, Total
Detected: 12 MG/L (ppm)
8/27/2025
Filtration considerations: See the table below for how whole-house carbon, under-sink reverse osmosis, and under-sink carbon systems compare against what's actually on file here. These are general system types, not a specific product recommendation.
Contaminant Whole-House Carbon Under-Sink RO Under-Sink Carbon
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)YesYesYes
Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)YesYesYes
ChloroformYesYesYes
Chlorine / TasteYesYesYes
Sediment / TurbidityYesYesYes
TrichloroethyleneYesYesYes
TetrachloroethyleneYesYesYes
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneYesYesYes
1,1-DichloroethyleneYesYesYes
BromoformYesYesYes
BromodichloromethaneYesYesYes
DibromochloromethaneYesYesYes
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneYesYesYes
Vinyl ChlorideYesYesYes
Carbon TetrachlorideYesYesYes
BenzeneYesYesYes
TolueneYesYesYes
XyleneYesYesYes
Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5)YesYesYes
LeadPartialYesPartial
ArsenicPartialYesPartial
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent)PartialYesPartial
CopperPartialYesPartial
Combined UraniumPartialYesPartial
PFOAPartialYes*Partial
PFOSPartialYes*Partial
NitratePartialYesPartial
Combined RadiumPartialYesPartial
DichloroaceticacidPartialYesPartial
TrichloroaceticacidPartialYesPartial
MonochloroaceticacidPartialYesPartial
Carbon, TotalPartialYesPartial
Chromium, HexPartialYesPartial
Alkalinity, TotalPartialYesPartial
Coliform Bacteria (indicator)NoYesNo
Alkalinity, BicarbonateNoNoNo

Browse by city

Browse by county

Want a different ZIP, city, or address?
Look up your water quality โ†’
Learn more
What is TTHM? Understanding EPA Violation Status Is Chromium-6 Dangerous? Whole-House vs. Under-Sink Filtration Lead and Copper in Drinking Water What is PFAS? Arsenic and Uranium Explained Nitrate and Fluoride Explained Water Hardness, pH, and Turbidity What is Coliform Bacteria?