whatsinmywater.co
Water Quality Lookup / California / Los Angeles County / ORCHARD DALE WATER DISTRICT
EPA SDWIS · Los Angeles County, California

ORCHARD DALE WATER DISTRICT Water Quality Report

Serving roughly 25,000 people in Los Angeles County, California.

Data current as of July 2026
🔍Straight from EPA
🧪Real Lab Results
📅Updated Quarterly
🏠Local Expertise
Results for ORCHARD DALE WATER DISTRICT

1 water provider directly on file, serving roughly 25,000 people in Los Angeles County, California.

Quick answer: ORCHARD DALE WATER DISTRICT has no violations on file and no single reading stands out against its peers (601 other providers in this area). It serves roughly 25,000 people, and the full breakdown below reflects everything EPA and California have on record for it.
Utility ORCHARD DALE WATER DISTRICT Population served 25,000 Owner Local government
No violations on file

Contaminants found

Metals
Naturally occurring or corrosion-related elements, e.g. lead, arsenic, copper
Lead Summary
Detected: 0.001 mg/L (ppm)
12/31/2024
Disinfection Byproducts
Formed when chlorine used to disinfect water reacts with organic matter
Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5)
Detected: 1.2 UG/L (ppb)
9/2/2025
TTHM
Detected: 8.9 UG/L (ppb)
9/2/2025
A group of disinfection byproducts formed when chlorine reacts with organic matter. Long-term exposure above the legal limit has been linked to increased cancer risk in some studies.
Chloroform
Detected: 3.2 UG/L (ppb)
9/2/2025
One of the individual trihalomethane disinfection byproducts, formed when chlorine reacts with organic matter.
Bromoform
Detected: 3.4 UG/L (ppb)
9/2/2025
Bromodichloromethane
Detected: 1 UG/L (ppb)
6/3/2025
Dibromochloromethane
Detected: 2.3 UG/L (ppb)
9/2/2025
PFAS & Emerging Contaminants
Human-made "forever chemicals" and other substances not yet fully regulated
PFPEA
Detected: 0.01 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
PFBS
Detected: 0.0072 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
PFHXA
Detected: 0.0072 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
PFOA
Detected: 0.0099 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
One of two PFAS with an enforceable federal limit (4 ppt) since 2024.
PFOS
Detected: 0.017 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
One of two PFAS with an enforceable federal limit (4 ppt) since 2024.
PFHXS
Detected: 0.004 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
PFBA
Detected: 0.0088 µg/L (ppb)
4/1/2025
Other
Additional substances tested that don't fit neatly into the categories above
Dibromoaceticacid
Detected: 1.2 UG/L (ppb)
9/2/2025
Filtration considerations: See the table below for how whole-house carbon, under-sink reverse osmosis, and under-sink carbon systems compare against what's actually on file here. These are general system types, not a specific product recommendation.
Contaminant Whole-House Carbon Under-Sink RO Under-Sink Carbon
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)YesYesYes
Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)YesYesYes
ChloroformYesYesYes
Chlorine / TasteYesYesYes
Sediment / TurbidityYesYesYes
TrichloroethyleneYesYesYes
TetrachloroethyleneYesYesYes
cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneYesYesYes
1,1-DichloroethyleneYesYesYes
BromoformYesYesYes
BromodichloromethaneYesYesYes
DibromochloromethaneYesYesYes
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneYesYesYes
Vinyl ChlorideYesYesYes
Carbon TetrachlorideYesYesYes
BenzeneYesYesYes
TolueneYesYesYes
XyleneYesYesYes
Totalhaloaceticacids (HAA5)YesYesYes
LeadPartialYesPartial
ArsenicPartialYesPartial
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent)PartialYesPartial
CopperPartialYesPartial
Combined UraniumPartialYesPartial
PFOAPartialYes*Partial
PFOSPartialYes*Partial
NitratePartialYesPartial
Combined RadiumPartialYesPartial
PFPEAPartialYes*Partial
PFBSPartialYes*Partial
PFHXAPartialYes*Partial
PFHXSPartialYes*Partial
PFBAPartialYes*Partial
DibromoaceticacidPartialYesPartial
Coliform Bacteria (indicator)NoYesNo

Browse by city

Browse by county

Want a different ZIP, city, or address?
Look up your water quality →
Learn more
What is TTHM? Understanding EPA Violation Status Is Chromium-6 Dangerous? Whole-House vs. Under-Sink Filtration Lead and Copper in Drinking Water What is PFAS? Arsenic and Uranium Explained Nitrate and Fluoride Explained Water Hardness, pH, and Turbidity What is Coliform Bacteria?